4.7 Article

Leaching kinetics of copper from waste printed circuit boards by electro-generated chlorine in HCl solution

期刊

HYDROMETALLURGY
卷 107, 期 3-4, 页码 124-132

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.009

关键词

Electro-generated chlorine; PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards); Copper leaching; Kinetics

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The leaching behavior of metals such as copper, zinc, lead and tin from waste printed circuit boards (PCBs) has been investigated using electro-generated chlorine in hydrochloric acid solution. The experiments were carried out by employing two different reactors: (a) a combined reactor facilitated with simultaneous Cl-2 generation and metal leaching, and (b) a separate metal leaching reactor connected with the anode compartment of a Cl-2 gas generator. Leaching efficiency in two reactors was compared for recycling of valuable metals from the PCBs. It was observed that the leaching rate of the metals increased with increase in current density, temperature and time in both reactors. The copper leaching rate gradually diminished when its dissolution was around 20 and 25% in the combined and separate reactor, respectively, which may be attributed to a decrease in surface area of copper with leaching time and the formation of CuCl(s) on the surface. The leaching efficiency of copper was found to be lower in the combined reactor than that of the separate reactor. The dissolution kinetics of copper with electro-generated chlorine followed empirical logarithmic law controlled by surface layer diffusion. The leaching mechanism of copper was further corroborated by SEM-EDS study of the residue. The activation energy for copper leaching in the combined and separate reactors was calculated to be 24.5 and 20.7 kJ/mol, respectively in the temperature range 298-323 K. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据