4.6 Article

Study of water cloud model vegetation descriptors in estimating soil moisture in Solani catchment

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 2137-2148

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10344

关键词

water cloud model; soil moisture; vegetation descriptors; synthetic aperture radar; backscatter coefficient; genetic algorithm; leaf area index; leaf water area index; normalized plant water content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water cloud model (WCM) relates the backscatter coefficient (sigma(o)) with soil moisture. The backscatter coefficient includes the backscatter coefficient due to vegetation (sigma(o)(veg)), and the backscatter coefficient due to soil (sigma(o)(soil)). The sigma(o)(veg) of WCM depends upon vegetation characteristics. The present study is aimed to investigate the effect of different vegetation descriptors in estimating soil moisture from WCM. The study is carried out in Solani River catchment of India. Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) images of three dates were acquired for the study. The field data, volumetric soil moisture from the upper 0-10cm soil layer, soil texture, soil surface roughness, leaf area index (LAI), leaf water area index, normalized plant water content and average plant height corresponding to satellite pass dates were collected. Genetic algorithm optimization technique is used to estimate the WCM vegetation parameters. The use of LAI as vegetation descriptor results in minimum root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.77dB between WCM computed backscatter and Envisat ASAR observed backscatter. Also, use of LAI in WCM as vegetation descriptor results in the least RMSE of 4.19%, between estimated and observed soil moisture for the first field campaign, whereas it was 5.64% for the last field campaign which was undertaken after 35days of first campaign. It is concluded that LAI can be treated as the best vegetation descriptor in studies retrieving soil moisture and backscatter from microwave remote sensing data. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据