4.6 Article

Landform-oriented flow-routing algorithmfor the dual-structure loess terrain based on digital elevation models

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 1756-1766

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9719

关键词

flow-routing algorithms; loess landform; digital elevation models

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40930531, 41171299]
  2. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System [2010KF0002SA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loess landform in the Loess Plateau of China is with typical dual structure, namely, the upper smooth positive terrain and the lower cliffy negative terrain (P-N terrain for short). Obvious differences in their morphological feature, geomorphological mechanism, and hydrological process could be found in the both areas. Based on the differences, a flow-routing algorithm that separately addresses the dual-structure terrain would be necessary to encompass this spatial variation in their hydrological behaviour. This paper proposes a mixed flow-routing algorithm to address aforementioned problems. First, the loess landform surface is divided into P-N terrains based on digital elevation models. Then, specific catchment area is calculated with the new algorithm to simulate the water flows in both positive and negative terrain areas. The mixed algorithm consists of the multiple flow-routing algorithm (multiple-flow direction) for positive areas and the D8 algorithm for negative areas, respectively. The approach is validated in two typical geomorphologic areas with low hills and dense gullies in the northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau. Four indices are used to examine the results, which show that the new algorithm is more suitable for loess terrain in simulating the spatial distribution of water accumulation, as well as in modeling the flow characteristics of the true surface by considering the morphological structures of the terrain. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据