4.6 Article

Using the SWAT model to assess impacts of land use changes on runoff generation in headwaters

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 1032-1042

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9645

关键词

land use; Three Gorges Reservoir; runoff coefficient; SWAT

资金

  1. Chinese National Special Science and Technology Program of Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2009ZX07528-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The upstream regions of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) have undergone significant changes in land use during recent years, and these changes have strongly influenced runoff generation downstream. In this study, the relationships between land use changes and corresponding hydrological responses in the Dong and Puli River basins in the upstream region of the TGR were quantified using the runoff coefficient. Empirical regression equations between the runoff coefficient and the percentage of land use types were developed for the study area using partial least squares regression (PLSR). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool was used to simulate the runoff generation processes in the two basins, and land use maps developed using Landsat Thematic Mapper images from 2000, 2005, and 2010 were compared to extract information on changes in land use. The results showed that the total area of forest and pasture decreased over the 10-year study period, while paddy fields and upland increased in both basins. These land use changes dramatically affected hydrological processes. Evapotranspiration decreased by 2.13% and 2.41% between 2000 and 2010 in the Dong and Puli River basins, respectively, whereas quickflow, infiltration, and baseflow increased to varying degrees. The PLSR modeling results showed that upland had a negative effect on the runoff coefficient and was the most influential land use type in the study area. In contrast, a positive effect of forest on runoff generation was found in most of the regression models. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据