4.6 Article

High-frequency storm event isotope sampling reveals time-variant transit time distributions and influence of diurnal cycles

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 308-316

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8210

关键词

stable isotopes; conservative tracer; fractionation; time-variant TTD; sampling resolution

资金

  1. Macaulay Development Trust
  2. Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-frequency sampling of stable water isotopes in precipitation and stream water during winter and summer storm events was carried out in a 2.3 km2 lowland agricultural catchment. During peak flows of monitored events, the responses of delta 2H and delta 18O were comparable and inferred the dominance (ca 70%) of old pre-event water. Transit Time Distribution (TTD) inferred by a gamma function were fitted (Nash-Sutcliffe = 0.8) and were also similar for delta 2H and delta 18O. However, the shape (alpha) and scaling (beta) parameters were markedly different for summer and winter events. Consequently, when antecedent wetness was high, mean transit times were in the order of days; when drier, they increased to months. Moreover, while the responses of delta 2H and delta 18O exhibited similar gradual recovery to pre-event conditions during winter hydrograph recessions, they differed dramatically on summer recessions. Time series analysis showed that delta 2H isotope content was correlated with the diurnal cycle of air temperature, suggesting an evaporative fractionation pattern which could be reproduced by a temperature-based first-order autoregressive model. The heavier delta 18O isotope showed no evidence for such diurnal variability. The study highlights the utility of high-frequency stable isotope sampling to explore the time-variant nature of TTDs. Furthermore, it shows that the time of sampling in a diurnal cycle may have crucial significance for interpreting stream isotope signatures, particularly delta 2H. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据