4.3 Article

Double umbilical cord blood transplant is effective therapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

期刊

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1607-1615

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1105370

关键词

Clinical results; graft-versus-host disease; lymphoma and Hodgkin disease

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA148600, P30 CA016672, R01 CA061508] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM100469] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sub-group of patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) who relapse after autologous stem cell transplant can achieve long-term disease-free-survival after allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). There is limited information regarding the tolerability and efficacy of double umbilical cord blood transplant (dUCBT) for relapsed/refractory HL. We analyzed 27 consecutive, heavily pre-treated patients receiving dUCBT for relapsed/refractory HL at two centers from 2003-2014. The majority of patients relapsed <6 months after autologous stem cell transplant. A total of 15 patients received myeloablative (most commonly melphalan, fludarabine, thiotepa and anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]) and 12 non-myeloablative conditioning regimens (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, 200cGy total body irradiation +/- ATG). All patients engrafted; median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 17 and 37 days, respectively. Overall response rate was 68%; 58% achieved complete remission. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.2 months; median overall survival was 27 months. Cumulative incidences of relapse and of non-relapse mortality at 5 years were 30% and 37.9%, respectively; 5-year PFS was 31.3% (95% CI 10.1-52.5). There was a trend toward inferior PFS in patients with lymph node size >= 2 cm at the time of alloSCT (p = 0.07) and toward inferior survival in patients with chemorefractory disease pre-alloSCT (p = 0.12). dUCBT is feasible in patients with heavily pre-treated HL and can achieve long-term disease-free survival in approximately 30% of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据