4.6 Article

Comparative hydrology: analysis of a semiarid and a humid tropical watershed

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 1169-1178

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7232

关键词

semiarid tropical watershed; humid tropical watershed; hydrological differences; evaporation; Brazil

资金

  1. CAPES/MES-Cuba [018/06]
  2. German Research Foundation DFG
  3. Brazilian Research Council CNPq [552411/2005-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyses measured data from two small tropical watersheds: one in a semiarid (Aiuaba, Brazil, 12.0 km(2), 5 years of measurements) and another in a humid environment (Jaruco, Cuba, 43.5 km(2), 21 years of measurements). The watersheds are similar with respect to catchment area (tens of kin 2), potential evaporation (2.1-2.6 m year(-1)), temperature (22-30 degrees C) and relief (mild hillslope steepness); but show considerable hydrological discrepancies: average precipitation in the humid watershed is two times higher; average river discharge (mm year(-1)) is five times higher; and Surface water availability (mm year(-1)) is 14 times higher than in the semiarid watershed. Long-term operation of hypothetical surface reservoirs in both basins is Simulated. The analysis shows that 73% of the average river discharge are available (with 90% annual reliability) in the humid watershed, against only 28% in the semiarid. The main cause of this difference is the excess evaporation, which consumes 55% of the stored water in the semiarid reservoir, but only 12% in the humid one. The research concludes that: (1) although precipitation indicators are higher in the humid area, they are of the same order of magnitude as in the semiarid; and (2) fluvial-regime and water-availability variables are more than one order of magnitude higher in the humid basin, which shows a multiplication effect of these hydrological processes. Such major hydrological differences, despite the similarities between the two tropical watersheds, show the importance of further investigations in the field of comparative hydrology. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据