4.6 Article

A new temperature based method to separate rain and snow

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 22, 期 26, 页码 5067-5085

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7131

关键词

precipitation separation; snow; rain; mean annual snowfall; sensitivity analysis; model intercomparison analysis

资金

  1. Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Water Research (AICWR) [42321]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This papar presents the development and testing of a new method to estimate daily snowfall from precipitation and associated temperature records. The new method requires to variables; the threshold mean daily air temperature at which 50% of precipitation is considered snow, and the temperature range within which mixed precipitation can occur. Sensitivity analyses using 15 climate stations across south-western Alberta, Canada, and ranging from prairie to alpine regions investigates the sensitivity of those two variables on mean annual snowfall (MAS), the coefficient of determination, and the MAS-weighted coefficient of determination. Existing methods, including the static threshold method, one linear transition method used by Quick and Pipes, and the Leavesley method employed in the PRMS hydrological modelling system are compared with the new method, using a total of 963 years of daily data from the 15 climate stations used for the sensitivity analyzes. Four different approaches to using the two input variables (threshold temperature and range) were tested and statistically compared: mean annual variables based on the 15 stations, mean annual variables for each station, mean monthly variables for each station, and a sine curve representing seasonal variation of the variables. In almost all cases the proposed new method resulted in higher MAS-weighted coefficients of determination, and, on average, they were significantly different from those of other methods. The paper concludes with a decision tree to help decide which method and approach to apply under a variety of data availabilities. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据