4.6 Article

Lateral flow thresholds for aspen forested hillslopes on the Western Boreal Plain, Alberta, Canada

期刊

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
卷 22, 期 21, 页码 4287-4300

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7038

关键词

subsurface flow; sprinkling experiment; threshold; Boreal Plain; antecedent soil moisture storage; hillslope hydrology; vertical recharge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To predict the long-term sustainability of water resources on the Boreal Plain region of northern Alberta, it is critical to understand when hillslopes generate runoff and connect with surface waters. The sub-humid climate (P <= ET) and deep glacial sediments of this region result in large available soil storage capacity relative to moisture surpluses or deficits, leading to thershold-dependent rainfall-runoff relationships. Rainfall simulation experiments were conducted using large magnitude and high intensity applications to examine the thresholds in precipitation and soil moisture that are necessary to generate lateral flow from hillslope runoff plots representative of Luvisolic soils and an aspen canopy. Two adjacent plots (areas of 2.95) and 3.4 m(2)) of constrasting antecedent moisture conditions were examined; one had tree root uptake excluded for two months to increase soil moisture content, while the second plot allowed tree uptake over the growing season resulting in drier soils. Vertical flow as drainage and soil moisture storage dominated the water balances of both plots. Greater lateral flow occured from the plot with higher antecedent moisture content. Results indicate that a minimum of 15-20 mm of rainfall is required to generate lateral flow, and only after the soils have been wetted to a depth of 0.75 m (C-horizon). The depth and intensity of rainfall events that generated runoff > 1 mm have return period of 25 years or greater and when combined with the need for wet antecendent conditions, indicate that lateral flow generation on these hillslopes will occur infrequently. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据