4.5 Article

A method for the stochastic modeling of karstic systems accounting for geophysical data: an example of application in the region of Tulum, Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico)

期刊

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 529-544

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-012-0944-1

关键词

Karst; Numerical modeling; Coastal aquifers; Geophysical methods; Mexico

资金

  1. Austria Science Fund [L524-N10]
  2. ETH Zurich
  3. Austrian Academy of Science
  4. Schlumberger Water Services
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 994] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I994] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The eastern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, contains one of the most developed karst systems in the world. This natural wonder is undergoing increasing pollution threat due to rapid economic development in the region of Tulum, together with a lack of wastewater treatment facilities. A preliminary numerical model has been developed to assess the vulnerability of the resource. Maps of explored caves have been completed using data from two airborne geophysical campaigns. These electromagnetic measurements allow for the mapping of unexplored karstic conduits. The completion of the network map is achieved through a stochastic pseudo-genetic karst simulator, previously developed but adapted as part of this study to account for the geophysical data. Together with the cave mapping by speleologists, the simulated networks are integrated into the finite-element flow-model mesh as pipe networks where turbulent flow is modeled. The calibration of the karstic network parameters (density, radius of the conduits) is conducted through a comparison with measured piezometric levels. Although the proposed model shows great uncertainty, it reproduces realistically the heterogeneous flow of the aquifer. Simulated velocities in conduits are greater than 1 cm s(-1), suggesting that the reinjection of Tulum wastewater constitutes a pollution risk for the nearby ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据