4.5 Review

A framework for understanding the hydroecology of impacted wet meadows in the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges, California, USA

期刊

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 229-246

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-008-0380-4

关键词

Ecohydrology; Groundwater dependent ecosystem; USA; Water table; Wetland

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-0729838, EAR-0337393]
  2. National Park Service, University of California-Center for Water Resources [WR995]
  3. USDA US Geologic Survey [06HQGR0074]
  4. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2001-16376]
  5. University of California-John Muir Institute of the Environment-Environmental

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meadows of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade mountains of California, USA, support diverse and highly productive wet-meadow vegetation dominated by sedges, rushes, grasses, and other herbaceous species. These groundwater-dependent ecosystems rely on the persistence of a shallow water table throughout the dry summer. Case studies of Bear Creek, Last Chance, and Tuolumne meadow ecosystems are used to create a conceptual framework describing groundwater-ecosystem connections in this environment. The water requirements for wet-meadow vegetation at each site are represented as a water-table-depth hydrograph; however, these hydrographs were found to vary among sites. Causes of this variation include ( 1) differences in soil texture, which govern capillary effects and availability of vadose water and ( 2) elevation-controlled differences in climate that affect the phenology of the vegetation. The field observations show that spatial variation of water-table depth exerts strong control on vegetation composition and spatial patterning. Groundwater-flow modeling demonstrates that lower hydraulic-conductivity meadow sediments, higher groundwater-inflow rates, and a higher ratio of lateral to basal-groundwater inflow all encourage the persistence of a high water table and wet-meadow vegetation, particularly at the margin of the meadow, even in cases with moderate stream incision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据