4.6 Article

Factors inducing overland movement of invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in a ricefield habitat

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 746, 期 1, 页码 135-146

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-014-2052-9

关键词

Biological invasions; Overland dispersion; Red swamp crayfish; Rice fields; Drought; Rain; Procambarus clarkii

资金

  1. European Fund for Economic and Regional Development (FEDER) through the Program Operational Factors of Competitiveness (COMPETE)
  2. National Funds through the Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology [PTDC/BIA-BEC/105 182/2008, FCOMP 01 0124 FEDER 00 89 65]
  3. Portuguese Foundation of Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/19373/2004]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/19373/2004] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) is a widespread invader which can disperse overland. This study was conducted to determine which factors can induce overland dispersal. During 12 months, the numbers of P. clarkii out of water were monitored at an experimental rice research station. Data were obtained on preferential time period for overland dispersal; population structure on land and in water; direction of movement; and the relation between environmental variables and the occurrence of crayfish out of water. A main factor inducing overland dispersal was intentional drainage of the study area associated with rice cultivation. During post-drainage, crayfish dispersal overland was positively correlated with rainfall. Other variables significantly affecting the overland dispersal of crayfish were the relative humidity, air temperature and the period of the day. We found significant differences in the structure of the trappable population in the water and of the individuals out of the water, with a higher proportion of mature individuals dispersing overland. Because overland migrants were dominated by mature individuals, often with eggs or hatchlings attached to the abdomen, these may effectively colonize new areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据