期刊
HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 676, 期 1, 页码 279-297出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0831-0
关键词
Zooplankton; Eutrophication; Indicator; Water Framework Directive (WFD); Lakes; Ecological state; Water quality
资金
- EU [226273, 244121]
- 'CLEAR' (a Villum Kann Rasmussen Centre of Excellence Project)
- Research Council for Nature and Universe [272-08-0406]
- Estonian target funding projects [SF0170006s08, SF0170011s08]
- Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship [255180]
With the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD), the member states have to classify the ecological status of surface waters following standardised procedures. It was a matter of some surprise to lake ecologists that zooplankton were not included as a biological quality element (BQE) despite their being considered to be an important and integrated component of the pelagic food web. To the best of our knowledge, the decision of omitting zooplankton is not wise, and it has resulted in the withdrawal of zooplankton from many so-far-solid monitoring programmes. Using examples from particularly Danish, Estonian, and the UK lakes, we show that zooplankton (sampled from the water and the sediment) have a strong indicator value, which cannot be covered by sampling fish and phytoplankton without a very comprehensive and costly effort. When selecting the right metrics, zooplankton are cost-efficient indicators of the trophic state and ecological quality of lakes. Moreover, they are important indicators of the success/failure of measures taken to bring the lakes to at least good ecological status. Therefore, we strongly recommend the EU to include zooplankton as a central BQE in the WFD assessments, and undertake similar regional calibration exercises to obtain relevant and robust metrics also for zooplankton as is being done at present in the cases of fish, phytoplankton, macrophytes and benthic invertebrates.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据