4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal variabilities of δ13C and δ15N within lower trophic levels of a large lake: implications for estimating trophic relationships of consumers

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 675, 期 1, 页码 41-53

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0794-1

关键词

Stable isotopes; Lake Erie; Fish; Yellow Perch; White Perch; Food webs

资金

  1. Canada Research Chair fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable isotopes of carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen (delta N-15) often have unique values among lake habitats (e.g. benthic, littoral, pelagic), providing a widely used tool for measuring the structure and energy flow in aquatic food webs. However, there has been little recognition of the spatial and temporal variabilities of these isotopes within habitats of aquatic ecosystems. To address this, delta C-13 and delta N-15 were measured in seston, zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and young-of-year (YOY) yellow (Perca flavescens), and white perch (Morone americana) collected from four sites across the offshore habitat of the western basin of Lake Erie during June-September 2009. Values of delta C-13 and delta N-15 showed significant spatial and temporal variations, with month accounting for > 50% of the variation, for both stable isotopes and all the species except seston. Such variation in isotope values has the potential to significantly influence or confound interpretation of stable isotopes in measures, such as trophic position (TP) which use lower trophic level organisms as their baseline. For example, TP was found to vary up to 0.7 for yellow and white perch (TP = delta N-15(fish) - delta N-15(zebra mussel)/diet-tissue fractionation factor) depending on the zebra mussel data used (e.g., from a different location or a different collection month). As the use of stable isotopes continues to move from qualitative to more quantitative measures of trophic structure, food web research must recognize the importance of stable isotopes' variability in lower trophic level organisms, especially in large lake systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据