4.7 Article

Incidence and description of autoimmune cytopenias during treatment with ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 346-350

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.273

关键词

-

资金

  1. Four Winds Foundation
  2. D. Warren Brown Foundation
  3. Harry Mangurian Foundation
  4. Sullivan CLL Research Foundation
  5. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  6. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA177292, K23 CA178183]
  7. Pharmacyclics
  8. National Cancer Institute, Pelotonia, Conquer Cancer Foundation [P50 CA140158, P01 CA095426]
  9. American Society of Hematology
  10. Janssen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is frequently complicated by secondary autoimmune cytopenias (AICs). Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL and CLL with del(17p). The effect of ibrutinib treatment on the incidence of AIC is currently unknown. We reviewed medical records of 301 patients treated with ibrutinib, as participants in therapeutic clinical trials at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center between July 2010 and July 2014. Subjects were reviewed with respect to past history of AIC, and treatment-emergent AIC cases were identified. Before starting ibrutinib treatment, 26% of patients had experienced AIC. Information was available for a total of 468 patient-years of ibrutinib exposure, during which there were six cases of treatment-emergent AIC. This corresponds to an estimated incidence rate of 13 episodes for every 1000 patient-years of ibrutinib treatment. We further identified 22 patients receiving therapy for AIC at the time ibrutinib was started. Of these 22 patients, 19 were able to discontinue AIC therapy. We found that ibrutinib treatment is associated with a low rate of treatment-emergent AIC. Patients with an existing AIC have been successfully treated with ibrutinib and subsequently discontinued AIC therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据