4.6 Article

CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE VIA KNOCKOFFS

期刊

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 2055-2085

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/15-AOS1337

关键词

Variable selection; false discovery rate (FDR); sequential hypothesis testing; martingale theory; permutation methods; Lasso

资金

  1. NSF [DMS-12-03762, CCF-0963835]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-09-1-0643]
  3. Math + X Award from the Simons Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many fields of science, we observe a response variable together with a large number of potential explanatory variables, and would like to be able to discover which variables are truly associated with the response. At the same time, we need to know that the false discovery rate (FDR) the expected fraction of false discoveries among all discoveries is not too high, in order to assure the scientist that most of the discoveries are indeed true and replicable. This paper introduces the knockoff filter, a new variable selection procedure controlling the FDR in the statistical linear model whenever there are at least as many observations as variables. This method achieves exact FDR control in finite sample settings no matter the design or covariates, the number of variables in the model, or the amplitudes of the unknown regression coefficients, and does not require any knowledge of the noise level. As the name suggests, the method operates by manufacturing knockoff variables that are cheap their construction does not require any new data and are designed to mimic the correlation structure found within the existing variables, in a way that allows for accurate FDR control, beyond what is possible with permutation-based methods. The method of knockoffs is very general and flexible, and can work with a broad class of test statistics. We test the method in combination with statistics from the Lasso for sparse regression, and obtain empirical results showing that the resulting method has far more power than existing selection rules when the proportion of null variables is high.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据