4.6 Review

Growth factors and myometrium: biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 772-790

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr031

关键词

myometrium; leiomyoma; growth factors; steroid hormones

资金

  1. Bayer Schering Pharma
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-10-1-0891]
  3. Clayton Medical Research Foundation
  4. National Cancer Institute [P30CA014195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Growth factors are proteins secreted by a number of cell types that are capable of modulating cellular growth, proliferation and cellular differentiation. It is well accepted that uterine cellular events such as proliferation and differentiation are regulated by sex steroids and their actions in target tissues are mediated by local production of growth factors acting through paracrine and/or autocrine mechanisms. Myometrial mass is ultimately modified in pregnancy as well as in tumour conditions such as leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Leiomyomas, also known as fibroids, are benign tumours of the uterus, considered to be one of the most frequent causes of infertility in reproductive years in women. METHODS: For this review, we searched the database MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles with content related to growth factors acting on myometrium; the findings are hereby reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: Different growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha), heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF), acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and TGF-beta perform actions in myometrium and in leiomyomas. In addition to these growth factors, activin and myostatin have been recently identified in myometrium and leiomyoma. CONCLUSIONS: Growth factors play an important role in the mechanisms involved in myometrial patho-physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据