4.6 Article

Oocyte activation, phospholipase C zeta and human infertility

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 690-703

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq018

关键词

human infertility; oocyte activation; sperm; phospholipase C zeta; calcium

资金

  1. Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Oxford
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC, UK)
  3. Royal Society, UK
  4. MRC [G0500672] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0500672] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian oocytes are activated by intracellular calcium (Ca2+) oscillations following gamete fusion. Recent evidence implicates a sperm-specific phospholipase C zeta, PLC zeta, which is introduced into the oocyte following membrane fusion, as the responsible factor. This review summarizes the current understanding of human oocyte activation failure and describes recent discoveries linking certain cases of male infertility with defects in PLC zeta expression and activity. How these latest findings may influence future diagnosis and treatment options are also discussed. Systematic literature searches were performed using PubMed, ISI-Web of Knowledge and The Cochrane Library. We also scrutinized material from the United Nations and World Health Organization databases (UNWHO) and the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA). Although ICSI results in average fertilization rates of 70%, complete or virtually complete fertilization failure still occurs in 1-5% of ICSI cycles. While oocyte activation failure can, in some cases, be overcome by artificial oocyte activators such as calcium ionophores, a more physiological oocyte activation agent might release Ca2+ within the oocyte in a more efficient and controlled manner. As PLC zeta is now widely considered to be the physiological agent responsible for activating mammalian oocytes, it represents both a novel diagnostic biomarker of oocyte activation capability and a possible mode of treatment for certain types of male infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据