4.7 Article

Novel alleles of HLA-DQ and -DR loci show association with recurrent miscarriages among South Indian women

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 765-774

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der024

关键词

recurrent miscarriages; HLA-DQ; HLA-DR; association; India

资金

  1. Indian Statistical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In this study, recurrent miscarriages (RMs) are defined as loss of two or more clinically detectable pregnancies before 20 weeks of gestation. HLA has been thought to play a role in RM. However, the results of earlier studies on the role of different human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genes were conflicting and inconclusive. In the present study, we investigate HLA genes (HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1) in RM couples with unknown etiology and normal couples. METHODS: Blood samples from 143 RM couples and 150 control couples were analyzed, firstly to validate previously reported association studies and secondly to explore whether any novel alleles or haplotypes specific to Indian populations can be observed to be associated with RM. HLA typing was carried out by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Results suggest an association of the DQB1*03:03:02 allele with RM (odd ratio = 2.66; p(c) = 0.02; confidence interval = 1.47-4.84). Haplotypes of the DQA1 and DQB1 risk alleles also showed a significant association with RM, albeit not after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DQB1 appears to have a strong involvement in the manifestation of RM in this population from South India. The current genetic analysis of RM and control couples not only highlights the genes exhibiting a strong etiological role but also reflects the protective nature of some HLA genes against RM. Nevertheless, most of these alleles/haplotypes were not those that are implicated in RM in other ethnic backgrounds, and hence require further validation in other populations of India, from different ethnic and/or geographic backgrounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据