4.7 Article

Analysis of X chromosome genomic DNA sequence copy number variation associated with premature ovarian failure (POF)

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 2139-2150

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq158

关键词

ovarian failure; X chromosome; CNV; female infertility; Q-PCR

资金

  1. Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a heterogeneous disease defined as amenorrhoea for > 6 months before age 40, with an FSH serum level > 40 mIU/ml (menopausal levels). While there is a strong genetic association with POF, familial studies have also indicated that idiopathic POF may also be genetically linked. Conventional cytogenetic analyses have identified regions of the X chromosome that are strongly associated with ovarian function, as well as several POF candidate genes. Cryptic chromosome abnormalities that have been missed might be detected by array comparative genomic hybridization. In this study, samples from 42 idiopathic POF patients were subjected to a complete end-to-end X/Y chromosome tiling path array to achieve a detailed copy number variation (CNV) analysis of X chromosome involvement in POF. The arrays also contained a 1 Mb autosomal tiling path as a reference control. Quantitative PCR for selected genes contained within the CNVs was used to confirm the majority of the changes detected. The expression pattern of some of these genes in human tissue RNA was examined by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. A number of CNVs were identified on both Xp and Xq, with several being shared among the POF cases. Some CNVs fall within known polymorphic CNV regions, and others span previously identified POF candidate regions and genes. The new data reported in this study reveal further discrete X chromosome intervals not previously associated with the disease and therefore implicate new clusters of candidate genes. Further studies will be required to elucidate their involvement in POF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据