4.7 Article

Association of maternal killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors and parental HLA-C genotypes with recurrent miscarriage

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 972-976

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den011

关键词

recurrent miscarriage; natural killer cells; HLA-C; trophoblast; killei-immunoglobulin-like receptor

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Funding Source: Medline
  2. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CO-12400] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The natural killer (NK) cells at the site of placentation express killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) that can bind to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C molecules on trophoblast cells. Both these gene systems are polymorphic and an association of particular maternal KIR/fetal HLA-C genotypes has been shown in pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia and recurrent miscarriage (RM) share the pathogenesis of defective placentation and therefore we have now genotyped couples with RM. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA was obtained from the male (n = 67) and female (n = 95) partners of couples with three or more spontaneous miscarriages and genotyped for HLA-C groups and 11 KIR genes using the PCR-sequence-specific primer method (SSP). The frequency of the HLA-C2 group was increased in both parents (reaching significance only in the male partners, P = 0.018) compared with a parous control population. The KIR gene frequencies of the male partners were similar to controls, but the women had a high frequency of KIR AA haplotypes that lack activating KIR. In particular, the activating KIR for HLA-C2 groups (KIR2DS1) was significantly lower in these women (P = 0.00035, odds ratio 2.63, confidence interval 1.54-4.49). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to identify a genetic male factor that confers risk in RM. These findings support the idea that successful placentation depends on the correct balance of NK cell inhibition and activation in response to trophoblast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据