4.7 Article

Soluble vascular endothelial-cadherin levels correlate with clinical and biological aspects of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 662-667

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem429

关键词

capillary permeability; endothelium; vascular endothelial-cadherin; vascular endothelial growth factor; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation, and the pathophysiological mechanisms that trigger the syndrome remain unknown. HCG increases serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations, and VEGF modulates transendothelial permeability via endothelial adherens junctions, a downstream target for VEGF signalling. We examined whether women with severe OHSS have altered serum levels of soluble vascular endothelial (sVE)-cadherin. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, case-control study of 28 women with severe OHSS and 34 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF without developing OHSS. We collected serum samples from both groups on the day of ovum retrieval (Day 0), and on Days 3, 6, 9 and 15. Samples were assayed for sVE-cadherin by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Women with severe OHSS had significantly higher levels of sVE-cadherin than patients without OHSS (P = 0.001). sVE-cadherin serum levels decreased with clinical improvement; however, they did not reach normal levels in the resolution phase. A positive correlation was demonstrated between sVE-cadherin and serum estradiol levels at the time of HCG administration (r = 0.621; P < 0.001). Serum sVE-cadherin levels were more closely chronologically correlated with corpus luteum function than with biological and clinical aspects of severe OHSS. CONCLUSIONS: sVE-cadherin may be involved in the pathogenesis of severe OHSS and may possibly serve as an indicator of corpus luteum function after COH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据