4.7 Article

Gene copy number variations in Asian patients with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 748-755

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den413

关键词

array-based comparative genomic hybridization; copy number variations; congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens; 3q26; 1 microdeletion; tiling path array

资金

  1. 'Fu Jen Catholic University School of Medicine'
  2. 'Cathay General Hospital'
  3. Cathay General Hospital
  4. Fu Jen Catholic University Education and Development Cooperation Project [CGH-FJU-95-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) is a distinct clinical entity accounting for similar to 25% of obstructive azoospermia in infertile men. The association between CBAVD and mutated CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) alleles is well demonstrated in Caucasians, but the identity of CBAVD-susceptibility genes remains elusive in Asians. We investigate genomic copy number variations (CNVs) in a patient cohort of Taiwan. Genome-wide screening for genetic CNVs was conducted on eight individuals with CBAVD using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. One recurrent CNV was detected on 3q26.1 in five patients, and another was detected on a reproduction-related gene PANK2 in two patients. For the former, we further characterized the breakpoints in CBAVD and assessed the incidence in healthy individuals by tiling path arrays. The deletion in each patient was confirmed, and seven out of the eight controls were also affected. Examination of the homozygous loss of PANK2 by PCR in a larger cohort showed a homozygous deletion in only one of the 26 CBAVD males, and not in any of the 20 azoospermic patients without CBAVD, nor in any of the 16 control subjects. Our results suggest that 3q26.1 may not be a critical region for CBAVD. Additionally no strong association was found for PANK2 in this reproduction disorder. Other reproduction-related genes, such as PBX1, BRD3, COL18A1 and HMOX1, identified by this initial study may inspire further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据