4.4 Article

Usefulness of epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression in the algorithmic approach to Lynch syndrome identification

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 412-416

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.06.006

关键词

Lynch syndrome; EPCAM gene; MSH2 gene; EPCAM expression; Colorectal carcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lynch syndrome (LS), the most frequent form of hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, is caused by germ-line mutations in the mismatch repair system genes. Recently, a new mechanism involving the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM)/TACSTD1 gene has been shown to be responsible in cases with abnormal MSH2 expression. Of interest, 3' exons deletions of the EPCAM gene, which is located upstream of MSH2 in chromosome 2, are associated with MSH2 promoter hypermethylation. EPCAM protein, expressed in epithelial tissues, is encoded by the EPCAM/TACSTD1 gene. Our study's aim was to explore EPCAM expression in colorectal carcinomas of MSH2-associated LS cases to evaluate the usefulness of EPCAM protein expression in the algorithm approach to LS population screening. We included a total of 19 MSH2-negative colorectal carcinomas from 14 different patients in whom we were able to perform a complete germ-line analysis. Nine patients showed a deleterious germ-line mutation that involved the MSH2 gene in 3 instances and the EPCAM gene exon 9 in 6 instances. All patients harboring the EPCAM mutation belonged to the same family. Of the 19 colorectal carcinomas, EPCAM expression loss was seen in only 5 tumors, all of them from patients showing a germ-line EPCAM deletion. Of interest, 6 tumors from 3 different patients carrying the same germ-line EPCAM deletion showed normal EPCAM expression. In conclusion, owing to the high specificity of EPCAM protein expression to identify LS patients carrying an EPCAM deletion, we recommend adding EPCAM immunohistochemistry to the LS diagnostic algorithm in MSH2-negative colorectal carcinoma. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据