4.4 Article

Total parenteral nutrition therapy and liver injury: a histopathologic study with clinical correlation

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 826-833

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.07.008

关键词

Total parenteral nutrition; TPN; Liver injury; Ductopenia; Perivenular fibrosis; Cholestasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) therapy is a well-recognized cause of liver injury. The histologic changes attributed to TPN in the literature vary widely. In this study, we describe the histopathologic changes associated with TPN therapy and relate these changes to various clinical parameters. We conducted a retrospective study of 89 patients who underwent biopsy or liver transplantation while on TPN. We report that (1) ductopenia, a previously unreported finding, is seen in a significant number of patients on TPN. It is more frequently seen in patients with low stage of fibrosis and may have an inverse relationship with the length of therapy; (2) Perivenular fibrosis is a feature frequently seen in patients with high-stage portal fibrosis. In fact, we find the combination of portal and perivenular fibrosis to be a characteristic of TPN injury; (3) Infants are more susceptible to TPN related hepatocellular injury, are more likely to develop fibrosis, and progress to high-stage fibrosis more rapidly than older children and adults; (4) Cholestasis, although more common in infants, is the most common pathologic finding in all age groups; (5) Steatosis is more commonly seen in older children and adults than in infants; (6) Progression to fibrosis in infants may be dependent on the length of therapy and the underlying disease for which TPN is administered; and (7) Clinical markers of liver injury (eg, elevated liver enzymes) do not predict the degree of hepatocellular injury or fibrosis, and therefore, serial biopsies may be indicated for patients on TPN therapy.(c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据