4.4 Article

Update on the serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.06.002

关键词

Colon adenocarcinoma; Serrated pathway; Sessile serrated adenoma; Traditional serrated adenoma; Hyperplastic polyp

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenocarcinoma of the large intestine can no longer be considered one disease but rather a family of diseases with different precursor lesions, different molecular pathways, and different end stage carcinomas with varying prognoses Approximately 60% of colorectal carcinomas arise from conventional adenomas via the suppressor pathway leading to microsatellite stable carcinomas These carcinomas represent the pathway that has been the target of screening and prevention programs to date However, approximately 35% of carcinomas arise along the serrated pathway developing from the precursor lesion known as the sessile serrated adenoma (also referred to as the sessile serrated polyp) Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps lead to carcinomas with extensive CpG island promoter methylation (CpG island methylated phenotype positive carcinomas), which can be either microsatellite instable high or microsatellite stable The remaining 5% of carcinomas arise from conventional adenomas in patients with germ line mutations of mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome), leading to CpG island methylated phenotype negative microsatellite instable carcinomas Carcinomas arising from sessile serrated adenomas/polyps are not prevented by removing conventional adenomas and hence may be missed in routine screening programs In addition, a subset of these lesions may potentially progress rapidly to carcinoma hence it is likely that these lesions will require a different screening strategy from that used for conventional adenomas This article reviews the various pathways to colorectal carcinoma with emphasis on the serrated pathway and evaluates the implications of this pathway for colorectal carcinomas screening programs (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据