4.4 Article

Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma-a clinicopathologic and array comparative genomic hybridization study

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 1231-1237

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.11.020

关键词

Lymphoma; Intestine; Enteropathy; Array comparative genomic hybridization

资金

  1. Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea [SBRI C-A8-202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the new World Health Organization classification system, there are 2 types of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Type 1 is associated with celiac disease and accounts for the majority of cases in Western countries, whereas type 2 is not associated with celiac disease. To characterize enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma types in Korea, we carried out clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic analyses of 8 Koreans with enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma and investigated genomic profile using array comparative genomic hybridization. The tumors involved the small intestine in 5 patients and the colorectum in 3 patients. Two patients carried an H LA DQB1*0302 allele that corresponds to HLA DQ8. None of the patients had gluten-sensitive malabsorption syndrome. Intraepithelial lymphocytosis was observed in all patients. The sizes of the tumor cells were small or small-to-medium in 7 cases and medium-to-large in 1 case. The immunophenotypes of the tumor cells were CD4-CD8+CD56+ in 4 cases, CD4-CD8+CD56- in 1 case, CD4-CD8-CD56+ in 2 cases, and CD4-CD8-CD56- in I case. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed that chromosome 9q33-q34.1 gain was present in 4 (80%) of the 5 cases examined. Other recurrent genomic alterations were gain of 6p21.1-21.31 (3/5, 60%), gain of 19q (2/5), and the loss of 3p12.1-p12.2 (2/5) and 3q26.31 (2/5). These results suggest that the most prevalent type of enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma in this geographic region is type 2, and the genetic changes associated with it are similar to those in Western countries. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据