4.4 Article

High tumor-infiltrating macrophage density predicts poor prognosis in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma after resection

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 381-389

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.08.011

关键词

Hepatoma; Immunohistochemistry; Macrophages; Metastasis; Survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages constitute a major component of the leukocyte infiltrate of tumors and perform distinct roles in different tumor microenvironments. This study attempted to investigate the prognostic values of tumor-infiltrating macrophages in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection, paying particular attention to their tissue microlocalization, The CD68(+) macrophages were assessed by immunohistochemistry in tissues from 137 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Prognostic value of intratumoral, marginal, and peritumoral macrophage densities was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Both intratumoral and marginal macrophage densities were associated inversely with overall survival (P = .034 and .004, respectively) and disease-free survival (P = .006 and .009, respectively). In contrast, peritumoral macrophage density was associated with neither overall survival nor disease-free survival. Intratumoral macrophage density emerged as an independent prognosticator of overall survival (hazard ratio - 1.721, P - .049) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.165, P = .007). Marginal macrophage density, but not intratumoral macrophage density, was associated with vascular invasion, tumor multiplicity, and fibrous capsule formation. Our results demonstrate that high macrophage infiltration predicts poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. These results, together With Our previous report showing the distinct activation patterns of macrophages in different areas of tumor tissue, implies that macrophages in those areas may use different strategies to promote the tumor progression. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据