4.4 Article

Noncollagenous bone matrix proteins as a part of calcific aortic valve disease regulation

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 39, 期 11, 页码 1695-1701

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.04.015

关键词

Aortic valve stenosis; Calcification; Bone matrix proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinically, calcific aortic valve disease is a progressive continuum from obstructive fibro (sclero)tic valve thickening to aortic stenosis. Recent evidence suggests that, in addition to nonbone miscellaneous mineralization, calcified valves present distinct signs of active bone remodeling; and in this context, noncollagenous bone-associated proteins are assumed to have a critical role. The expression of 5 bone matrix proteins-bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -4, bone sialoprotein II, osteopontin, and osteoprotegerin-was examined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (n = 31) and immunolabeling (n = 83) in the clinical continuum from healthy pliable valves to heavily calcified ones. As a known structural pathologic sign, the extent of neovascularization was also examined. We observed progressive increase in the gene expression of osteopontin (7.4-fold elevation, P <.001) and bone sialoprotein II (5.8-fold elevation, P <.05), and also 1.7-fold elevation (P <.05) in osteoprotegerin gene expression during the disease course. These findings were congruent with that of immunohistochemical analysis. Surprisingly, bone morphogenetic protein-2 and -4 showed a comparable significant decrease in messenger RNA levels in calcified valves (P <.01 and P <.05, respectively). Our results support the view that aortic valve calcification is an actively regulated process. Furthermore, the results suggest that the expression of pro- and anticalcific noncollagenous bone-associated matrix proteins is altered during the disease continuum and that this imbalance may contribute to the pathology of calcific aortic valve disease. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据