4.5 Article

Transcriptional hallmarks of noonan syndrome and noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 703-709

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22026

关键词

Noonan syndrome; RASopathies; PTPN11; SOS1; SHOC2

资金

  1. AIRC [IG9127]
  2. Regione Piemonte (e-LAB, PRESTO)
  3. FPRC-ONLUS
  4. Telethon-Italy [GGP10020]
  5. ERA-Net (NSEuroNet)
  6. Convenzione Italia-USA [11US/10]
  7. Compagnia di San Paolo
  8. Regione Piemonte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noonan syndrome (NS) is among the most common nonchromosomal disorders affecting development and growth. NS is genetically heterogeneous, being caused by germline mutations affecting various genes implicated in the RAS signaling network. This network transduces extracellular signals into intracellular biochemical and transcriptional responses controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, and senescence. To explore the transcriptional consequences of NS-causing mutations, we performed global mRNA expression profiling on peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from 23 NS patients carrying heterozygous mutations in PTPN11 or SOS1. Gene expression profiling was also resolved in five subjects with Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair (NS/LAH), a condition clinically related to NS and caused by an invariant mutation in SHOC2. Robust transcriptional signatures were found to specifically discriminate each of the three mutation groups from 21 age- and sex-matched controls. Despite the only partial overlap in terms of gene composition, the three signatures showed a notable concordance in terms of biological processes and regulatory circuits affected. These data establish expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a powerful tool to appreciate differential perturbations driven by germline mutations of transducers involved in RAS signaling and to dissect molecular mechanisms underlying NS and other RASopathies. Hum Mutat 33:703709, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据