4.5 Article

Paralogous annotation of disease-causing variants in long QT syndrome genes

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1188-1191

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22114

关键词

variant annotation; paralogue; nonsynonymous; long QT syndrome; inherited heart disease

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [087183/Z/08/Z]
  2. British Heart Foundation [SP/10/10/28431]
  3. Medical Research Council (UK)
  4. Royal Brompton, National Institute for Health Research, UK
  5. Harefield Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, National Institute for Health Research, UK
  6. British Heart Foundation [SP/10/10/28431] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2007-21-004] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Wellcome Trust [087183/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discriminating between rare benign and pathogenic variation is a key challenge in clinical genetics, particularly as increasing numbers of nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are identified in resequencing studies. Here, we describe an approach for the functional annotation of nonsynonymous variants that identifies functionally important, disease-causing residues across protein families using multiple sequence alignment. We applied the methodology to long QT syndrome (LQT) genes, which cause sudden death, and their paralogues, which largely cause neurological disease. This approach accurately classified known LQT disease-causing variants (positive predictive value = 98.4%) with a better performance than established bioinformatic methods. The analysis also identified 1078 new putative disease loci, which we incorporated along with known variants into a comprehensive and freely accessible long QT resource (), based on newly created Locus Reference Genomic sequences (). We propose that paralogous annotation is widely applicable for Mendelian human disease genes. Hum Mutat 33:11881191, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据