4.5 Review

Novel Genomic Techniques Open New Avenues in the Analysis of Monogenic Disorders

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 144-151

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21400

关键词

monogenic; exome sequencing; disease gene identification

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Innovative Medizinische Forschungsforderung'' of the University of Munster
  3. Intramurale Forschungsforderung'' of the University of Kiel
  4. Heinrich-Hertz-Foundation
  5. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies''

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular genetic cause of over 3,000 monogenic disorders is currently unknown. This review discusses how novel genomic techniques like Next-Generation DNA Sequencing (NGS) and genotyping arrays open new avenues in the elucidation of genetic defects causing monogenic disorders. They will not only speed up disease gene identification but will enable us to systematically tackle previously intractable monogenic disorders. These are mainly disorders not amenable to classic linkage analysis, for example, due to insufficient family size. Most monogenic diseases are caused by exonic mutations or splice-site mutations changing the amino acid sequence of the affected gene. These mutations can be identified by sequencing of all exons in the human genome (exome sequencing) rendering whole genome sequencing unnecessary in most cases. Genotyping arrays containing 10(5)-2 x 10(6) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and nonpolymorphic markers allow highly accurate mapping of genomic deletions and duplications not detectable by exome sequencing, which are the second most common cause of monogenic disorders. However, several hundred rare, previously unknown sequence variants affecting the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein are found in the exome of every human individual. Therefore, the main challenge will be the differentiation between the many rare benign variants detected by novel genomic techniques and disease causing mutations. Hum Mutat 32:144-151, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据