4.5 Article

LPIN1 Gene Mutations: A Major Cause of Severe Rhabdomyolysis in Early Childhood

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 E1564-E1573

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21282

关键词

Rhabdomyolysis; LPIN1; intragenic deletion; founder effect

资金

  1. AFM [13864, 13988]
  2. Fondation de l'Avenir [09071]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  4. Prinses Beatrix Fonds [WAR05-0126]
  5. Barth syndrome foundation
  6. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0509-10011] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autosomal recessive LPIN1 mutations have been recently described as a novel cause of rhabdomyolysis in a few families. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of LPIN1 mutations in patients exhibiting severe episodes of rhabdomyolysis in infancy. After exclusion of primary fatty acid oxidation disorders, LPIN1 coding sequence was determined in genomic DNA and cDNA. Among the 29 patients studied, 17 (59%) carried recessive nonsense or frameshift mutations, or a large scale intragenic deletion. In these 17 patients, episodes of rhabdomyolysis occurred at a mean age of 21 months. Secondary defect of mitochondrial fatty oxidation or respiratory chain was found in skeletal muscle of two patients. The intragenic deletion, c. 2295-866_2410-30del, was identified in 8/17 patients (47%), all Caucasians, and occurred on the background of a common haplotype, suggesting a founder effect. This deleted human LPIN1 form was unable to complement Delta pah1 yeast for growth on glycerol, in contrast to normal LPIN1. Since more than 50% of our series harboured LPIN1 mutations, LPIN1 should be regarded as a major cause of severe myoglobinuria in early childhood. The high frequency of the intragenic LPIN1 deletion should provide a valuable criterion for fast diagnosis, prior to muscle biopsy. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据