4.5 Article

Massively Parallel Sequencing of Ataxia Genes after Array-Based Enrichment

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 492-499

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21221

关键词

massively parallel sequencing; NGS; sequence enrichment; resequencing; ataxia

资金

  1. EU [Health-F5-2009-223143]
  2. AnEUploidy [LSHG-CT-2006-37627]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [917.66.36]
  4. European Science Directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Massively parallel sequencing has tremendous diagnostic potential but requires enriched templates for sequencing. Here we report the validation of an array-based sequence capture method in genetically heterogeneous disorders. The model disorder selected was AR ataxia, using five subjects with known mutations and two unaffected controls. The genomic sequences of seven disease genes, together with two control loci were targeted on a 2-Mb sequence-capture array. After enrichment, the patients' DNA samples were analyzed using one-quarter Roche GS FLX Titanium sequencing run, resulting in an average of 65 Mb of sequence data per patient. This was sufficient for an average 25-fold coverage/base in all targeted regions. Enrichment showed high specificity; on average, 80% of uniquely mapped reads were on target. Importantly, this approach enabled automated detection of deletions and hetero- and homozygous point mutations for 6/7 mutant alleles, and greater than 99% accuracy for known SNP variants. Our results also clearly show reduced coverage for sequences in repeat-rich regions, which significantly impacts the reliable detection of genomic variants. Based on these findings we recommend a minimal coverage of 15-fold for diagnostic implementation of this technology. We conclude that massive parallel sequencing of enriched samples enables personalized diagnosis of heterogeneous genetic disorders and qualifies for rapid diagnostic implementation. Hum Mutat 31:492-499, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据