4.5 Article

Analysis of Inherited Genetic Variations at the UGT1 Locus in the French-Canadian Population

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 677-687

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20946

关键词

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; UGT1; haplotypes; HtSNPs; HapMap

资金

  1. Canada Research Chair Program
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [CIHR MOP-42392]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1 locus is composed of nine exon Is, each flanked by a unique promoter region, and common exons (2, 3, 4, and the alternatively spliced exons 5a and 5b). Here, we characterized the genetic architecture of the UGT1 gene in a Caucasian sample. Overall, 98 variations in regulatory domains, exons and exon-intron boundaries were genotyped in 254 unrelated subjects, including 12 unreported UGT1 polymorphisms. We determined allele frequencies, computed pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD), and inferred haplotypes; this thorough analysis yielding a limited number of common UGT1 haplotypes. Moreover, only 17 haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNPs) are required to capture most of the allelic diversity of the locus. Four haplotype blocks were inferred: Block 9/6 (UGT1A9, UGT1A7 and UGT1A6), Block 4 (UGT1A4), Block 3/1 (UGT1A3 and UGT1A1), and Block C (3'UTR). A high level of linkage exists between Blocks 9/6 and 3/1, while the 3'UTR SNPs are genetically isolated. The most common haplotype (16.5%) presents multiple deleterious alleles, mainly 1A1*28, 1A3*2, 1A6*2, and 1A7*4. More interestingly, we reveal the co-occurrences of multiple deleterious variations, some of which could be associated with interindividual differences in glucuronidation. Comparison with the HapMap data set demonstrated differences in haplotypic diversity between ethnic samples, but similarity between Caucasian cohorts, as observed previously. This report provides relevant data for further pharmnacogenomic studies. Hum Mutat 30, 677-687, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据