4.5 Review

Emerging Themes and New Challenges in Defining the Role of Structural Variation in Human Disease

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 135-144

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20843

关键词

CNV; deletion; duplication; inversion

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Program [219250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread use of array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) in both research and clinical laboratories has created a renaissance in the field of molecular cytogenetics, revealing that the human genome contains both a wealth of structural polymorph, ism and many novel genomic disorders. A new generation of experimental platforms enable structural variants to be identified with increasing resolution, and will require the development of more sophisticated methods to assess the pathogenic significance of novel structural variants if these technologies are to be of clinical utility. Indeed, we are now entering an era in which technologies to detect CNVs have advanced much faster than our understanding of the consequences of these variants on human phenotypes, and I argue that over the last few years the problem has now become one of interpretation rather than identification. This problem is made more complex by the realization that many genomic disorders show highly variable penetrance, blurring the boundary of how to define benign vs. pathogenic variants. I discuss insights from recent research which shed light on potential mechanisms that may underlie this phenomenon, and possible methods to determine the genetic elements that are responsible for the associated phenotype. Furthermore, there is now a growing appreciation that the underlying chromosomal architecture which catalyses many genomic disorders is polymorphic within the general population, and I discuss potential mechanisms by which inversion polymorphisms might create predispositions to genomic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据