4.5 Article

Bezafibrate induces autophagy and improves hepatic lipid metabolism in glycogen storage disease type Ia

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 143-154

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy343

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore NMRC [NMRC/CIRG/1340/2012, NRMC/CSA/0054/2013, NMRC/BING/2025/2014]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [5R01DK105434-04]
  3. Roivant Rare Diseases
  4. Alice and Y.T. Chen Center for Genetics and Genomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucose-6-phosphatase alpha (G6Pase) deficiency, also known as von Gierke's Disease or Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia), is characterized by decreased ability of the liver to convert glucose-6-phosphate to glucose leading to glycogen accumulation and hepatosteatosis. Long-term complications of GSD Ia include hepatic adenomas and carcinomas, in association with the suppression of autophagy in the liver. The G6pc-/- mouse and canine models for GSD Ia were treated with the pan-peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor agonist, bezafibrate, to determine the drug's effect on liver metabolism and function. Hepatic glycogen and triglyceride concentrations were measured and western blotting was performed to investigate pathways affected by the treatment. Bezafibrate decreased liver triglyceride and glycogen concentrations and partially reversed the autophagy defect previously demonstrated in GSD Ia models. Changes in medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase expression and acylcarnintine flux suggested that fatty acid oxidation was increased and fatty acid synthase expression associated with lipogenesis was decreased in G6pc-/- mice treated with bezafibrate. In summary, bezafibrate induced autophagy in the liver while increasing fatty acid oxidation and decreasing lipogenesis in G6pc-/- mice. It represents a potential therapy for glycogen overload and hepatosteatosis associated with GSD Ia, with beneficial effects that have implications for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据