4.5 Article

Dominant mutations in ORAI1 cause tubular aggregate myopathy with hypocalcemia via constitutive activation of store-operated Ca2+ channels

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 637-648

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu477

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of the NCNP [26-8, 25-5, 23-4]
  2. Research on Applying Health Technology grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [H23-JITSUYOUKA(NANBYOU)-IPPAN-008, H26-ITAKU(NAN)-IPPAN-081]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25670149, 26461549, 24118001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The store-operated Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) channel is activated by diminished luminal Ca2+ levels in the endoplasmic reticulum and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and constitutes one of the major Ca2+ entry pathways in various tissues. Tubular aggregates (TAs) are abnormal structures in the skeletal muscle, and although their mechanism of formation has not been clarified, altered Ca2+ homeostasis related to a disordered SR is suggested to be one of the main contributing factors. TA myopathy is a hereditary muscle disorder that is pathologically characterized by the presence of TAs. Recently, dominant mutations in the STIM1 gene, encoding a Ca2+ sensor that controls CRAC channels, have been identified to cause tubular aggregate myopathy (TAM). Here, we identified heterozygous missense mutations in the ORAI1 gene, encoding the CRAC channel itself, in three families affected by dominantly inherited TAM with hypocalcemia. Skeletal myotubes from an affected individual and HEK293 cells expressing mutated ORAI1 proteins displayed spontaneous extracellular Ca2+ entry into cells without diminishment of luminal Ca2+ or the association with STIM1. Our results indicate that STIM1-independent activation of CRAC channels induced by dominant mutations in ORAI1 cause altered Ca2+ homeostasis, resulting in TAM with hypocalcemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据