4.5 Article

Zebrafish cul4a, but not cul4b, modulates cardiac and forelimb development by upregulating tbx5a expression

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 853-864

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu503

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB966200, 2013CB910900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovative Research Group [81321061]
  3. Research Fund for Excellent Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province [BS2011YY031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CUL4A and CUL4B are closely related cullin family members and can each assemble a Cullin-RING E3 ligase complex (CRL) and participate in a variety of biological processes. While the CRLs formed by the two cullin members may have common targets, the two appeared to have very different consequences when mutated or disrupted in mammals. We here investigated the roles of cul4a and cul4b during zebrafish embryogenesis by using the morpholino knockdown approach. We found that cul4a is essential for cardiac development as well as for pectoral fin development. Whereas cul4a morphants appeared to be unperturbed in chamber specification, they failed to undergo heart looping. The failures in heart looping and pectoral fin formation in cul4a morphants were accompanied by greatly reduced proliferation of cardiac cells and pectoral fin-forming cells. We demonstrated that tbx5a, a transcription factor essential for heart and limb development, is transcriptionally upregulated by cul4a and mediates the function of cul4a in cardiac and pectoral fin development. In contrast to the critical importance of cul4a, cul4b appeared to be dispensable for zebrafish development and was incapable of compensating for the loss of cul4a. This work provides the first demonstration of an essential role of cul4a, but not cul4b, in cardiac development and in the regulation of tbx5a in zebrafish. These findings justify exploring the functional role of CUL4A in human cardiac development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据