4.5 Article

Functional variations modulating PRKCA expression and alternative splicing predispose to multiple sclerosis

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 23, 期 25, 页码 6746-6761

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu392

关键词

-

资金

  1. FISM-Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla [2008/R/1, 2011/R/14]
  2. Fondazione CARIPLO-Cassa di Risparmio delle provincie Lombarde [2010-0728]
  3. Fondazione CRT-Cassa di Risparmio di Torino (Turin, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protein kinase C alpha (PRKCA) gene, encoding a Th17-cell-selective kinase, was repeatedly associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), but the underlying pathogenic mechanism remains unknown. We replicated the association in Italians (409 cases, 723 controls), identifying a protective signal in the PRKCA promoter (P = 0.033), and a risk haplotype in intron 3 (P = 7.7 x 10(-4); meta-analysis with previously published data: P = 4.01 x 10(-8)). Expression experiments demonstrated that the protective signal is associated with alleles conferring higher PRKCA expression levels, well fitting our observation that MS patients have significantly lower PRKCA mRNA levels in blood. The risk haplotype was shown to be driven by aGGTGins/del polymorphism influencing the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H-dependent inclusion/skipping of a PRKCA alternative exon 3*. Indeed, exon 3* can be present in two different versions in PRKCA mRNAs (out-of-frame 61 bp or in-frame 66 bp long), and is preferentially included in transcripts generated through a premature polyadenylation event. The GGTG insertion downregulates 3* inclusion and shifts splicing towards the 66 bp isoform. Both events reduce the nonsense-mediated mRNA-decay-induced degradation of exon 3*-containing mRNAs. Since we demonstrated that the protein isoform produced through premature polyadenylation aberrantly localizes to the plasma membrane and/or in cytoplasmic clusters, dysregulated PRKCA 3* inclusion may represent an additional mechanism relevant to MS susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据