4.5 Article

PLEKHG5 deficiency leads to an intermediate form of autosomal-recessive CharcotMarieTooth disease

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 22, 期 20, 页码 4224-4232

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddt274

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Lausanne
  2. Gebert Ruf Foundation [GRS-046/09]
  3. GUS-Rare Diseases Institute
  4. Association francaise contre les myopathies (AFM)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_135735/1, 320030-121929, 310030_138346]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_135735, 320030-121929, 310030_138346] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CharcotMarieTooth disease (CMT) comprises a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of peripheral neuropathies characterized by progressive distal muscle weakness and atrophy, foot deformities and distal sensory loss. Following the analysis of two consanguineous families affected by a medium to late-onset recessive form of intermediate CMT, we identified overlapping regions of homozygosity on chromosome 1p36 with a combined maximum LOD score of 5.4. Molecular investigation of the genes from this region allowed identification of two homozygous mutations in PLEKHG5 that produce premature stop codons and are predicted to result in functional null alleles. Analysis of Plekhg5 in the mouse revealed that this gene is expressed in neurons and glial cells of the peripheral nervous system, and that knockout mice display reduced nerve conduction velocities that are comparable with those of affected individuals from both families. Interestingly, a homozygous PLEKHG5 missense mutation was previously reported in a recessive form of severe childhood onset lower motor neuron disease (LMND) leading to loss of the ability to walk and need for respiratory assistance. Together, these observations indicate that different mutations in PLEKHG5 lead to clinically diverse outcomes (intermediate CMT or LMND) affecting the function of neurons and glial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据