4.5 Article

Mitofusin 2 is necessary for striatal axonal projections of midbrain dopamine neurons

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 21, 期 22, 页码 4827-4835

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds352

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2011-62X-21870-01-6, K2009-61X-03185-39-3]
  2. Swedish Brain Power
  3. Parkinsonfonden, Sweden
  4. Hjarnfonden, Sweden
  5. Karolinska Institute (DPA)
  6. Vetenskapsradet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial dysfunction is implicated in aging and degenerative disorders such as Parkinsons disease (PD). Continuous fission and fusion of mitochondria shapes their morphology and is essential to maintain oxidative phosphorylation. Loss-of-function mutations in PTEN-induced kinase1 (PINK1) or Parkin cause a recessive form of PD and have been linked to altered regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. More specifically, the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin has been shown to directly regulate the levels of mitofusin 1 (Mfn1) and Mfn2, two homologous outer membrane large GTPases that govern mitochondrial fusion, but it is not known whether this is of relevance for disease pathophysiology. Here, we address the importance of Mfn1 and Mfn2 in midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons in vivo by characterizing mice with DA neuron-specific knockout of Mfn1 or Mfn2. We find that Mfn1 is dispensable for DA neuron survival and motor function. In contrast, Mfn2 DA neuron-specific knockouts develop a fatal phenotype with reduced weight, locomotor disturbances and death by 7 weeks of age. Mfn2 knockout DA neurons have spherical and enlarged mitochondria with abnormal cristae and impaired respiratory chain function. Parkin does not translocate to these defective mitochondria. Surprisingly, Mfn2 DA neuron-specific knockout mice have normal numbers of midbrain DA neurons, whereas there is a severe loss of DA nerve terminals in the striatum, accompanied by depletion of striatal DA levels. These results show that Mfn2, but not Mfn1, is required for axonal projections of DA neurons in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据