4.5 Article

IRX4 at 5p15 suppresses prostate cancer growth through the interaction with vitamin D receptor, conferring prostate cancer susceptibility

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 2076-2085

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences and Technology of the Japanese government
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22390306]
  3. Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. BioBank Japan
  6. Rotary Club of Osaka-Midosuji District 2660 Rotary International in Japan
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390306, 22134008, 10J02102] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified a number of prostate cancer (PC) susceptibility loci, but most of their functional significances are not elucidated. Through our previous GWAS for PC in a Japanese population and subsequent resequencing and fine mapping, we here identified that IRX4 (Iroquois homeobox 4), coding Iroquois homeobox 4, is a causative gene of the PC susceptibility locus (rs12653946) at chromosome 5p15. IRX4 is expressed specifically in the prostate and heart, and quantitative expression analysis revealed a significant association between the genotype of rs12653946 and IRX4 expression in normal prostate tissues. Knockdown of IRX4 in PC cells enhanced their growth and IRX4 overexpression in PC cells suppressed their growth, indicating the functional association of IRX4 with PC and its tumor suppressive effect. Immunoprecipitation confirmed its proteinprotein interaction to vitamin D receptor (VDR), and we found a significant interaction between IRX4 and VDR in their reciprocal transcriptional regulation. These findings indicate that the PC-susceptibility locus represented by rs12653946 at 5p15 is likely to regulate IRX4 expression in prostate which could suppress PC growth by interacting with the VDR pathway, conferring to PC susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据