4.5 Article

Dysregulation of Rho GTPases in the αPix/Arhgef6 mouse model of X-linked intellectual disability is paralleled by impaired structural and synaptic plasticity and cognitive deficits

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 268-286

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr457

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR885/IRP5, FOR885/IRP2, SFB854/TP11]
  2. European Commission [QLG3-CT-2002-01810]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, NWO [051.04.090]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. National Competence Center for Research (NCCR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the ARHGEF6 gene, encoding the guanine nucleotide exchange factor alpha PIX/Cool-2 for the Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42, cause X-linked intellectual disability (ID) in humans. We show here that alpha Pix/Arhgef6 is primarily expressed in neuropil regions of the hippocampus. To study the role of alpha Pix/Arhgef6 in neuronal development and plasticity and gain insight into the pathogenic mechanisms underlying ID, we generated alpha Pix/Arhgef6-deficient mice. Gross brain structure in these mice appeared to be normal; however, analysis of Golgi-Cox-stained pyramidal neurons revealed an increase in both dendritic length and spine density in the hippocampus, accompanied by an overall loss in spine synapses. Early-phase long-term potentiation was reduced and long-term depression was increased in the CA1 hippocampal area of alpha Pix/Arhgef6-deficient animals. Knockout animals exhibited impaired spatial and complex learning and less behavioral control in mildly stressful situations, suggesting that this model mimics the human ID phenotype. The structural and electrophysiological alterations in the hippocampus were accompanied by a significant reduction in active Rac1 and Cdc42, but not RhoA. In conclusion, we suggest that imbalance in activity of different Rho GTPases may underlie altered neuronal connectivity and impaired synaptic function and cognition in aPix/Arhgef6 knockout mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据