4.5 Article

The Batten disease gene CLN3 is required for the response to oxidative stress

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 2037-2047

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr088

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Wellcome Trust [082004]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2009CB919000, 2007CB947200]
  3. MRC [G0901899] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0901899] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the CLN3 gene cause juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL or Batten disease), an early onset neurodegenerative disorder. JNCL is the most common of the NCLs, a group of disorders with infant or childhood onset that are caused by single gene mutations. The NCLs, although relatively rare, share many pathological and clinical similarities with the more common late-onset neurodegenerative disorders, while their simple genetic basis makes them an excellent paradigm. The early onset and rapid disease progression in the NCLs suggests that one or more key cellular processes are severely compromised. To identify the functional pathways compromised in JNCL, we have performed a gain-of-function modifier screen in Drosophila. We find that CLN3 interacts genetically with the core stress signalling pathways and components of stress granules, suggesting a function in stress responses. In support of this, we find that Drosophila lacking CLN3 function are hypersensitive to oxidative stress yet they respond normally to other physiological stresses. Overexpression of CLN3 is sufficient to confer increased resistance to oxidative stress. We find that CLN3 mutant flies perceive conditions of increased oxidative stress correctly but are unable to detoxify reactive oxygen species, suggesting that their ability to respond is compromised. Together, our data suggest that the lack of CLN3 function leads to a failure to manage the response to oxidative stress and this may be the key deficit in JNCL that leads to neuronal degeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据