4.5 Article

Dysregulation of hypoxia pathways in fumarate hydratase-deficient cells is independent of defective mitochondrial metabolism

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 19, 期 19, 页码 3844-3851

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddq305

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Cancer Research UK [C6079/A9485, C10843/A12027]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT091112MA]
  4. Science Foundation of Ireland [07/IN.1/B1804]
  5. British Heart Foundation [PS/02/002/14893, RG/07/004/22659] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Cancer Research UK [11562] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the gene encoding the Krebs cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH) predispose to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in affected individuals. FH-associated neoplasia is characterized by defective mitochondrial function and by upregulation of transcriptional pathways mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), although whether and by what means these processes are linked has been disputed. We analysed the HIF pathway in Fh1-/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), in FH-defective neoplastic tissues and in Fh1-/- MEFs re-expressing either wild-type or an extra-mitochondrial restricted form of FH. These experiments demonstrated that upregulation of HIF-1 alpha occurs as a direct consequence of FH inactivation. Fh1-/- cells accumulated intracellular fumarate and manifested severe impairment of HIF prolyl but not asparaginyl hydroxylation which was corrected by provision of exogenous 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG). Re-expression of the extra-mitochondrial form of FH in Fh1-/- cells was sufficient to reduce intracellular fumarate and to correct dysregulation of the HIF pathway completely, even in cells that remained profoundly defective in mitochondrial energy metabolism. The findings indicate that upregulation of HIF-1 alpha arises from competitive inhibition of the 2-OG-dependent HIF hydroxylases by fumarate and not from disruption of mitochondrial energy metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据