4.5 Article

Genetic background conversion ameliorates semi-lethality and permits behavioral analyses in cystathionine β-synthase-deficient mice, an animal model for hyperhomocysteinemia

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 17, 期 13, 页码 1994-2005

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn097

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cystathionine beta-synthase-deficient mice (Cbs(-/-)) exhibit several pathophysiological features similar to hyperhomocysteinemic patients, including endothelial dysfunction and hepatic steatosis. Heterozygous mutants (Cbs(+/-)) on the C57BL/6J background are extensively analyzed in laboratories worldwide; however, detailed analyses of Cbs(-/-) have been hampered by the fact that they rarely survive past the weaning age probably due to severe hepatic dysfunction. We backcrossed the mutants with four inbred strains (C57BL/6J(Jcl), BALB/cA, C3H/HeJ and DBA/2J) for seven generations, and compared Cbs(-/-) phenotypes among the different genetic backgrounds. Although Cbs(-/-) on all backgrounds were hyperhomocysteinemic/hypermethioninemic and suffered from lipidosis/hepatic steatosis at 2 weeks of age, > 30% of C3H/HeJ-Cbs(-/-) survived over 8 weeks whereas none of DBA/2J-Cbs(-/-) survived beyond 5 weeks. At 2 weeks, serum levels of total homocysteine and triglyceride were lowest in C3H/HeJ-Cbs(-/-). Adult C3H/HeJ-Cbs(-/-) survivors showed hyperhomocysteinemia but escaped hypermethioninemia, lipidosis and hepatic steatosis. They appeared normal in general behavioral tests but showed cerebellar malformation and impaired learning ability in the passive avoidance step-through test, and required sufficient dietary supplementation of cyst(e)ine for survival, demonstrating the essential roles of cystathionine beta-synthase in the central nervous system function and cysteine biosynthesis. Our C3H/HeJ-Cbs(-/-) mice could be useful tools for investigating clinical symptoms such as mental retardation and thromboembolism that are found in homocysteinemic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据