4.2 Article

MiR-20b,-21, and-130b inhibit PTEN expression resulting in B7-H1 over-expression in advanced colorectal cancer

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 348-353

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.01.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270031]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [12KJB320012]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-inhibitor B7-H1 expresses in various cancers and contributes to cancer immune evasion by inhibiting T cell activation and proliferation, yet the regulatory mechanisms for B7-H1 over-expression in cancers remain largely unknown. Here, the expression of B7-H1 and PTEN proteins were firstly detected by using immunohistochemistry method. B7-H1 immunoreactivities were found in 54.5% (55/101) of the colorectal cancer tissues with no expression in the normal tissues, and the PTEN protein immunoreactivities were observed in 51.5% (52/101) of the colorectal cancer tissues and 72.3% (73/101) of the normal tissues. Statistical analysis results indicated that the B7-H1 expression was negatively correlated to the PTEN expression in colorectal cancer (p = 0.001). Then the expressions of microRNAs (miRNAs) in six pairs of colorectal cancer and normal tissues were determined by miRNA array, and 30 up-regulated miRNAs were found in the colorectal cancer tissues. Finally, the impact of these up-regulated miRNAs on PTEN expression was tested by using dual-luciferase reporter assay system, from which the results indicated that miR-20b, -21, and -130b were involved in suppression of PTEN expression. These findings suggest that miR-20b, -21, and -130b, up-regulated in colorectal cancer, through inhibiting the expression of PTEN, result in 137-H1 over-expression in colorectal cancer. (C) 2014 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据