4.2 Article

The autoimmune-predisposing variant of lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase favors T helper 1 responses

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 574-585

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.12.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Cancer Society
  2. Oxnard Foundation
  3. Research Council of Norway
  4. Abbott

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C1858T single nucleotide polymorphism in PTPN22, which is the gene encoding lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase (LYP), confers increased risk for various autoimmune disorders in Caucasians. Although the disease-associated LYP allele (LYP(*)W620) is a gain-of-function variant that has higher catalytic activity than the major allele (LYP(*)R620), it is still unclear how LYP(*)W620 predisposes for autoimmunity. Here, we compared both T cell signaling and T cell function in healthy human donors homozygous for either LYP(*)R620 or LYP(*)W620. Generally, the presence of LYP(*)W620 caused reduced proximal T cell antigen receptor-mediated signaling (e.g. zeta chain phosphorylation) but augmented CD28-associated signaling (e.g. ART activation). Altered ligand binding properties of the two LYP variants could explain these findings since LYP(*)R620 interacted more strongly with the p85 subunit of PI3K Variation in signaling between cells expressing either LYP(*)R620 or LYP(*)W620 also affected the differentiation of conventional CD4(+)T cells. For example, LYP(*)W620 homozygous donors displayed exaggerated Th1 responses (e.g. IFN gamma production) and reduced Th17 responses (e.g. IL-17 production). Importantly, while regulatory T cells normally suppressed Th1 -mediated IFN gamma production in LYP(*)R620 homozygous individuals, such suppression was lost in LYP(*)W620 homozygous individuals. Altogether, these findings provide a molecular and cellular explanation for the autoimmune phenotype associated with LYP(*)W620. (C) 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据