4.2 Article

Low levels of vasoactive intestinal peptide are associated with Chagas disease cardiomyopathy

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 74, 期 10, 页码 1375-1381

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.06.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. INCT-DT
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico - CNPq Universal [472025/2011-2]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG [APQ-04129-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interconnection between immune and neuroendocrine systems influences regulation of inflammatory responses. The possible relevance that this integrative response may have during the course of Chagas disease remains poorly characterized. In this context, our study was designed to determine the expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), a neuropeptide with anti-inflammatory properties, in blood from the indeterminate and cardiac polarized forms of Chagas disease. Moreover, we determined whether the differential expression of VIP is associated with the development of cardiomyopathy in individuals infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Finally, we analyzed gene polymorphisms of VIP receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2, and performed correlation analysis of these polymorphisms with the different clinical forms of Chagas disease. Our results demonstrated that low plasma levels of VIP were associated with the cardiac morbidity in Chagas disease. Accordingly, correlation analysis showed that low plasma levels of VIP were associated with worse cardiac function, as determined by left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular diastolic diameter values. Polymorphism analysis showed a significant association between VPAC1 and the indeterminate form of Chagas disease development. Our data indicate that VIP expression and its receptors' polymorphism may be important in determining susceptibility to progression from mild to severe forms of Chagas disease. (c) 2013 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据